Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 00:31

Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Marines in LA as ICE protests spread to more U.S. cities: In photos - Axios
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Vanessa Bryant Denies Pregnancy Rumors with Rihanna Meme on Instagram - Bleacher Report
Russia can stop this any time.
Just in the last 5 years:
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
5 Things to Know Before the Stock Market Opens - Investopedia
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
What’s next?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
The Webb telescope found something exceedingly rare around a dying star - Mashable
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Are LGBT people accepted in Japan?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Switch 2 Joy-Con drift is already haunting Nintendo - polygon.com
Thank you.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Trump is forcing this dirty, costly coal plant to stay open - The Washington Post